Ted Baker Plc Ratio Analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Ted Baker Plc Ratio Analysis - Essay Example The P/E ratio for Ted baker Plc shows that the company has 1 worth of annual- per share earnings for every 17.4 in the share price. The company's P/E ratio is lower than that of the companies in the same sector. This ratio reveals the percentage of dividends paid to shareholders in dividends. Ted baker Plc's dividend payout is 39.92% of the earnings per share and the retail apparel industry's average for dividend payout is 20.93%, therefore the company has more potential for investment in terms of dividend paid by the company. The gross margin assesses the company's profit after accounting for production and distribution costs. The company's gross margin is 59% of the total turnover, which is lesser than the industrial average for this ratio. This shows that the company is incurring less cost of sales than the other companies in the industry, which is influencing its gross margin of profit. The operating margin is assesses the profitability of a company after accounting for all the operating costs. The operating margin for the retail apparel sector is showing as negative, whereas the operating margin for Ted baker Plc is 16.5% of the total turnover. It is much attractive for an investor to invest in a company with high profit margins. The Earning Per Share analysis is important for the investors who are interested in the market of price of company's shares. The EPS of Ted baker Plc is higher than the sector average, therefore has potential for investment than the other companies in the industry. EPS Growth Sector Ted baker Plc 97.11 20.7 The Earning Per Share of Ted baker Plc is growing at a slower rate than that of the industry. This shows that although the company has offered more EPS than the other companies in the same sector for the year 2005, but it has a much slower growth rate of EPS than its competitors in the industry. Dividend per share Sector Ted baker Plc 0.03 0.108 The dividend per share paid by the company is more than that of the other companies in the sector. Therefore, Ted baker Plc offers investment potential for the investors that invest in the company to gain return out of dividends paid by company. Dividend estimate Yield Sector Ted baker Plc 2.41 2.49 The dividend yield ratio is calculated by comparing the latest dividend paid by the company with the current market price of the company's shares. The dividend yield of Ted baker Plc is almost the same as paid by the other companies in the industry. Interest expense coverage Sector Ted baker Plc 108.66 76.71 This ratio reveals the ability of a company to cover its interest expense after accounting for all the operating costs incurred by the company. Ted baker Plc's interest cover ratio is lesser than the sector average. In the year 2005, the company generated returns of about 76.71% of the total interest expense, not enough to cover the interest even a single time. CONCLUSION After the above analysis, it is clear that Ted baker Plc off

Real or imaginary child with disabilities into a general education Essay

Real or imaginary child with disabilities into a general education class - Essay Example The most suitable model to use is a Response to Intervention (RTI) model. This an academic intervention method used to help children with needs such as difficulty learning or learning disabilities. It is an early intervention, which prevents failure in academics by measuring progress of such a child frequently, and inducing interventions that are research based to instruct and aide children with such difficulties. Some children do not respond to such interventions, and their problem is deep rooted in that the children could have disability stemming from the biological make-up (Vaughn, 2010). Unlike the discrepancy model that is common for the normal children with ability, this model will be an alternative to Frank who is in need of supplementary education. Personnel The personnel who will handle the process will be three normal classroom teachers, who will teach mathematics, a language subject, and a science subject respectively. The teachers who will handle Frank will be individuals who are highly qualified and trained adequately to implement this model. They will be individuals who understand Frank better and will be able to connect with him in order to get the required results. The selected teachers will compile a comprehensive report within a period of five weeks and will use the report to provide the child with the supplementary three-tier program. This is as recommended by Phaneuf (2008). Accommodations and modifications Accommodations and modifications will focus on changing the teaching techniques, and assessment on Frank’s progress. The accommodations the teachers will consider into the curriculum include one-on-one quizzes, group discussion with the other children, large print materials to enable Frank see and comprehend well, colored charts, extended or shortened assignments and assessments. They will also use pictures, animation, colors, and sounds to help Frank grasp and understand the content quickly. Some of the modifications that the teac hers will consider include, changing the grading scale particularly if Frank fails to compete with the rest and introduction of special education and special education teacher in tier three if Frank utterly fails to improve. Strategies School screening Assessment This is the first strategy that will help identify Frank’s strengths and weaknesses. Screenings will last for a period of five weeks (Phaneuf 2008: 54).The first thing the teachers will carry out is to assess whether he requires such interventions. This will take place in a normal classroom where he will get academic surveillance. This will enable evaluation of the Frank’s performance based on the basic subjects in the curriculum such as mathematics, sciences, and languages. His ability to perform tasks such as reading and comprehending, solving mathematical sums and carrying out practical tasks will undergo evaluation and the report will contribute significantly towards identifying his strengths and weaknesse s. The teaching will follow the curriculum of the classroom. It will be research based, one tested in the field and proved effective and containing all the fundamentals of teaching a normal child with able faculties. This screening will establish a specific criterion, which will rank the Frank’s performance in various categories. The percentile score will show whether his performance is poor, average, above average or excellent. Comparison of the